Ten Things Everyone Misunderstands About Railroad Lawsuit Blood Cancer

Ten Things Everyone Misunderstands About Railroad Lawsuit Blood Cancer

Christiane 0 81 2023.12.01 19:42
Colon Cancer Caused by Railroad Work

Regular exposure to hazardous chemicals is a daily occurrence for railroad workers. It has been demonstrated that this can cause cancer and other serious conditions.

Asbestos and diesel exhaust for instance both have been associated with colon cancer. It's also been confirmed that exposure to certain solvents, metal-working fluids, and pesticides may increase the risk of colon cancer.

Exposures

Whether they are unloading or loading chemicals cleaning up spills breathing diesel exhaust or using different solvents railroad workers are exposed harmful substances while performing their job. Many of these carcinogens can be linked to cancer or other chronic health conditions. Federal Employers Liability (FELA) provides the railroad workers with cancer or chronic illnesses.

For instance, a wife of a retired railroad employee claimed that her husband's death from stomach cancer caused by asbestos was due to his employment with CSX Transportation Inc. She asserts that CSX did not provide the proper safety equipment to safeguard him from inhaling asbestos fibers when sanding, washing and painting materials that contained the hazardous material.

Another FELA claim concerns railroad workers who were exposed to coal dust, creosote and other harmful substances while on the job. These chemicals can cause blood cancers, and lung disease.

Benzene, a poisonous chemical, Railroad Cancer Lawsuit Settlements is found in a wide range of products used by railroads. This includes fuel and solvents. Studies have found a link between benzene and a variety of cancers including colon cancer. A skilled lawyer for railroad cancer could determine if your illness was caused by on-the-job exposure to harmful chemicals and file a claim on your behalf. Federal law restricts the time to make claims. It is therefore crucial to seek out an attorney as soon as possible.

Diagnosis

Rail workers are exposed to toxic fumes and chemicals on the job. Welding fumes and asbestos diesel exhaust, as well as weed killers like Imazethapyr or dicamba, could cause colon cancer. Railroad workers diagnosed with a health issue related to their job may be entitled to compensation under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA).

An attorney for wasatch railroad contractors lawsuit accidents will be able to assist you with this claim. FELA, passed in 1908, requires railroads pay for injuries that occur while working. This could include cancer diagnoses and other injuries.

At the end of 2016, a widow in Illinois filed an action against csx railroad lawsuit Transportation Inc. claiming that the company failed to adopt adequate safety measures to prevent her husband's death from stomach cancer that metastasized to colon cancer. The plaintiff, Ruth Frieson, claims that her husband's exposure to asbestos and toxins as a result of his work at CSX caused the cancer and eventually his death. The jury heard testimony from two doctors from rehabilitative medicine, industrial hygienists and the wife of the plaintiff, as well as his medical oncologist. They all claimed that asbestos, diesel exhaust and a lifetime of smoking contributed to the cancer. However, the jury returned a verdict for the railroad defendant after just a little over three hours of deliberation.

Treatment

If you've been diagnosed with colon cancer due to your railroad cancer lawsuit settlements job it is crucial to seek legal advice right as soon as possible. Under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), injured railroad workers have three years after their diagnosis to start a lawsuit.

Depending on how your cancer was diagnosed, there could be a myriad of complications in bringing a suit against railroads. For example, in some cases, it may be difficult to pinpoint exactly the time and date of exposure to toxic substances since a lot of these chemicals have a long half-life.

When determining how much you could be awarded for your injury, the jury will consider various factors. These include loss of income, medical expenses, and the suffering and pain you've endured. You may be entitled wrongful-death damages if your loved ones die as a result.

In a recent case an ex-railroad employee claimed the cancer he developed was due to his exposure on the job to diesel exhaust, asbestos, and other toxic chemicals. He alleged that the railroads were not in compliance with FELA safety regulations. However, the court decided that the plaintiff had not conducted a "reasonably diligent" search for information about his disease. The jury decided that he didn't have sufficient evidence to back his claim.

Damages

Railroad workers and people living near railyards are exposed a number of toxic and carcinogenic chemicals, such as asbestos and diesel exhaust. If you've suffered from illnesses due to exposure, our Houston railroad lawsuits exposure lawyer can assist you in obtaining compensation. In addition to covering future and past medical expenses, you could be entitled to compensation for lost earnings and costs for caregivers. In addition, you may be able to pursue damages for pain and Railroad Cancer Lawsuit Settlements suffering and loss of enjoyment life, emotional distress and many more.

Our firm was awarded a defense jury verdict in a Federal Employers' Liability Act case on behalf of the railroad client. The plaintiff claimed that he contracted Hodgkin's and kidney cancer as a result of occupational exposure to creosote, diesel exhaust, and other toxic substances while working for the railroad as an engineer of locomotives. After less than an hour of deliberation the jury rendered a defense verdict.

In a separate FELA lawsuit our lawyers obtained a summary judgment in favor of the defendant railroad lawsuit. The case was brought by an ex-train conductor. The lawsuit claimed that he had lung cancer as a result of his railroad work and was caused by asbestos and other toxic chemicals. We claimed that the claim was void due to an earlier release agreement signed in connection with his settlement of an earlier asbestos case.

Comments